In the judgment, the Court unanimously found . On November 27, 2018, the European Court of Human Rights (hereafter the ECtHR or the Court) delivered a judgment in the case of Alekseyev and Others v. Russia. The alphorn or alpenhorn or alpine horn is a labrophone, consisting of a straight several-meter-long wooden natural horn of conical bore, with a wooden cup-shaped mouthpiece.Traditionally the Alphorn was made of one single piece, or two parts at most, and made from the wood of a red pine tree. The judgment brought some much needed good news for LGBT rights. [11] Bayev is similar to other LGBT-related cases against Russia taken to the ECtHR in that the court ruled in favor of the applicants but the ruling had little effect in Russia. Janowiec and Others v. Russia fue un caso presentado ante el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos en 2007 y concluido en 2013 sobre la cuestin de las violaciones de derechos humanos en el contexto de la masacre de Katyn. Andrey Asafyev Bogie Engineering Expert at Engineering Center of Railway Transport (ECRT) Moscow. Se decidi el 13 de julio de 2021 en el que la Tercera Sala dictamin por unanimidad que la negativa de Rusia a reconocer legalmente a las parejas del mismo sexo violaba los derechos humanos de los solicitantes en virtud del artculo 8 del Convenio Europeo de . 81]. Key cases 2017 Cases by Article Page 8 On 20 June 2017 the European Court of Human Rights ruled in the case of Bayev and Others against Russia that Russian legislation that bans promotion of homosexuality to minors encourages homophobia and discrimination. The court addressed whether this interference was justified on any of the grounds permitted under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). and "Children have the right to know. The Court also found that the government had not demonstrated that the suppression of information about same sex relationships would reverse a negative demographic trend. [1] The only dissent was from Dmitry Dedov, the judge elected with respect to Russia. Link to the original URL of the specific case analysis, publication, update, blog or landing page of the down loadable content you are referencing. No comments: Post a Comment. List of words with 5 letters with V and Y. The applicants were charged under these laws. BAYEV v. RUSSIA AND OTHER APPLICATIONS - STATEMENT OF FACTS AND QUESTIONS 3 On 11 January 2012 the applicant stood in front of the children's library in Arkhangelsk holding a banner stating "Russia has the world's highest rate of teenage suicide. In a judgment in the case of Bayev v Russia ([2017] ECHR 572) handed down on 20 June 2017, the Third Section of European Court of Human Rights found - by six votes to one - that the so-called Russian "gay-propaganda law" banning the promotion of homosexuality violated both Article 10 and Article 14 of the Convention.. The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know . The European Court of Human Rights held that Russia had violated the right to freedom of expression and the prohibition against discrimination when it convictedthree applicants who were charged with administrative offenses for their nonviolent demonstrations held in front of a school and library to counter the stigma associated with homosexuality. worded judgment in Bayev and Others v. Russia.2 The Court not only found Russia's legislative prohibition of the "promotion of homosexuality" among minors to be a violation of Article 10 (the right to freedom of expression) and Article 14, read together with Article 10, butalso didso in a well-reasoned, straightforward judgment that easily Applications nos. 67667/09, 44092/12, and 56717/12. The government essentially repeated the same submissions as it made in Bayev. ). Issue and resolution: Discrimination and LGBT rights. CASE OF BAYEV AND OTHER VS. RUSSIA CASE OF BAYEV, KISELEV AND ALEKSEYEV V. RUSSIA This case was originated by applications. Sometimes the trees would bend from the weight of snow during the wintertime, and this caused them to . The Court found quite the opposite; it said that disseminating information about same-sex relations actually educated the young about the potential risks involved and how to protect themselves against it. 3) June 2001 - 2002 - July 2001- 2002 - QC of seismic data (SPW processing system), Certification courses, " GMG" LLP, Processing Center in Moskow, Russia 4) April 2008 - May 2008 - Certification courses "Bosset", "Life on sea " Aktau, "YKK" LLP 5) August 2012 - August 2012 - Courses on industrial safety. The dissenting judgment argued that the freedom of expression of the protesters conflicted with the private life of the children and the right of their parents to educate their children in accordance with their religious and philosophical convictions. On 20 June 2017, the court ruled that the applicants' freedom of expression had been compromised. Background: Three LGBT activists held protests outside schools or childrens libraries in Russia, where they had held signs including slogans such as Homosexuality is normal, Children have a right to know. Justice Dedov dissented from the decision, arguing that the majority did not engage in the proper balancing test between the privacy rights of the children and their parents and the applicants rights to freedom of expression. Deputies are child-killers. Broadcast date - 6 December 2022. Posted by Rights in Russia at 18:09. Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom) Rights in Russia Providing information about human rights in Russia Bayev and Others v. Russia (67667/09, 44092/12 and 56717/12) was a case brought to the European Court of Human Rights by three Russian activistsNikolay Bayev, Aleksei Aleksandrovich Kiselev, and Nikolay Alekseyevalleging that the Russian gay propaganda law infringed on their freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [5], The case was heard by the third section of the ECtHR, composed of the judges Helena Jderblom (Sweden), Luis Lpez Guerra (Spain), Helen Keller (Switzerland), Dmitry Dedov (Russia), Alena Polkov (Slovakia), Georgios Sergides (Cyprus), and Jolien Schukking (Netherlands). case of dmitriy ryabov v. russia 33774/08 01/08/2013 case of ageyevy v. russia 7075/10 18/04/2013 case of h. v. finland 37359/09 13/11/2012 case of knecht v. romania 10048/10 02/10/2012 case of costa and pavan v. italy 54270/10 28/08/2012 case of stubing v. germany 43547/08 12/04/2012 case of pontes v. portugal 19554/09 10/04/2012 case of s.h . While the majority is important for its legal impact, the dissent is important for the window it provides into a non-Western world view. Newer Post Older Post Home. They take this step because of the lack of information about their nature. While popular sentiments may play a role in the Courts assessment, the Court drew a distinction between using popular support to extend the scope of the Conventions guarantees and using it to narrow the scope of protection. President Biden's prisoner exchange with Russia secured the release of WNBA star Brittney Griner on Thursday, but left U.S. Marine veteran Paul Whelan in Russian custody. 67667/09, 44092/12 and 56717/12) the European Court of Human Rights held, by six votes to one, that there had been: a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights, and A previous post discussed the majority opinion in Bayev and Others v. Russia, where the ECtHR found that Russia's anti-gay propaganda law violated the European Convention on Human Rights.I want to focus on the dissent. Specifically, the Court rejected the argument that there is a conflict between maintaining family values and the social acceptance of homosexuality, particularly in light of the growing tendency to include same-sex couples within the concept of family life under the ECHR. List of LGBT-related cases before international courts and quasi-judicial bodies (1,916 words) exact match in snippet view article find links to article 52596/13) Gender reassignment and its consequences 2017, June Bayev and Others v. The government accepted that there had been an interference with the applicants freedom of expression, so it fell to the Court to determine whether that interference was justified. The Court held that the government had been unable to provide any explanation of the mechanism by which a child could be enticed into a homosexual lifestyle nor scientific evidence that sexual orientation or identity is susceptible to change under external influence. After the challenges failed, the activists brought complaints to the European Court of Human Rights. [9] Russia argued that homosexual propaganda could cause "a minor [to] be enticed into '[a] homosexual lifestyle'", but the court found that this claim was "lacking any evidentiary basis". However the Court noted that the laws were vague and broad in scope, for example, they did not specify what was meant by promoting a homosexual lifestyle and the restrictions on promotion were not limited to specific situations or places, such as those where children might be targeted. Nikolay Bayev, Aleksei Aleksandrovich Kiselev, and Nikolay Alekseyev were Russian LGBT rights activists. One of the activists also challenged the constitutionality of the Code of Administrative Offences before the Constitutional Court. Bayev and Others v. Russia (application nos. Court reasoning: The parties to the complaint agreed that Russian law infringed the freedom of expression of the applicants. Homosexuality is good!" Further, the Court found that by protecting the rights of sexual minorities, the government was not disrupting traditional family values because it is the governments responsibility to take into account the changing landscape of rights for sexual minorities. exercise of freedom of expression Whether interference justified Public morals Public health Rights of others Whether legislative ban discriminatory Whether respondent State violating Article 10, and . On 20 June 2017, the court ruled that the applicants . Bayev and Ors. Fedotova and Others v. Russia fue un caso presentado por seis ciudadanos rusos ante el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos (TEDH). I want to focus on the dissent. Dissent (Judge Dedov, Russia): The judge argued that the majority of the Court had erred in analysing the case as a matter of discrimination with regards to freedom of expression rather than a case of a conflict of rights between the freedom of expression and the right to private and family life. [4] Justine De Kerf predicted that the anti-gay propaganda law could not be upheld in Strasbourg because "this type of legislation even threatens the very concepts the Court is bound to protect: universal human rights and the principles of democracy". Bayev and Others v. Russia (67667/09, 44092/12 and 56717/12) was a case brought to the European Court of Human Rights by three Russian activistsNikolay Bayev, Aleksei Aleksandrovich Kiselev, and Nikolay Alekseyevalleging that the Russian gay propaganda law infringed on their freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 10 of the European Conventio n .2017 6 20 . Baka v. Hungary This case summary is provided by the Child Rights International Network for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-174422. Nurbol Zhailaubayev Materials specialist - Wabtec Corporation. Search of HUDOC for violation of Articles 14 + 10: Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, "European Rights Court Rules Against Russian Gay 'Propaganda' Law", "Anti-Gay Propaganda Laws: Time for the European Court of Human Rights to Overcome Her Fear of Commitment", Opinion on the issue of the prohibition of so-called propaganda of homosexuality in the light of recent legislation in some member states of the Council of Europe adopted by the Venice commission at its 95th plenary session (Venice, 1415 June 2013), "The Dissent in Bayev and Others v. Russia: A Window into an Illiberal World View", https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22documentcollectionid2%22, "Bayev and Others v. Russia: on Judge Dedov's outrageously homophobic dissent", "We're Here, We're Queer, and We're Here to Stay: Zhdanov and Others v. Russia and the State of the European Court of Human Rights Judgments on Queer Rights Against Russia", "Rights in the Populist Era, A Comment on Bayev v. Russia (ECtHR): More Didactic than Persuasive", "ECtHR finds Russia's gay propaganda law discriminatory in strong-worded judgment", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bayev_and_Others_v._Russia&oldid=1123285828, European Court of Human Rights case law on LGBT rights, Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, Jderblom, joined by Keller, Guerra, Polkov, Sergides, Schukking, This page was last edited on 22 November 2022, at 22:31. This is a reference to Russia's " gay propaganda laws ", which prohibit dissemination of information about homosexuality to minors. (violation of Articles 10 and 14 of the Convention) Bayev v. In relation to Article 13 the government . for this article. The decision also forces Russia to follow the emerging European trend to recognize and value individual rights, regardless of sexual orientation. The Court decisively said that Russia's anti-gay propaganda law violated freedom of expression and was discriminatory. Russia. Download Judgment: English. Bayev had demonstrated with signs stating "Homosexuality is normal and I am proud of my homosexuality". BUDAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA Title: BUDAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA Party: Russian Federation Region: Europe Data source: InforMEA ECOLEX subject (s): Environment gen. Abstract: The town of Tyrnauz is situated in the mountain district adjacent to Mount Elbrus, in the central Caucasus. The Court also rejected the governments argument that the ban was justified for the protection of the rights of others, by ensuring that children were not converted to a homosexual lifestyle that would be detrimental to their development and make them vulnerable to abuse. Field hockey and ice ballet are. Case before the European Court of Human Rights. Bayev And Others v Russia: ECHR 20 Jun 2017 ECHR Judgment : Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression- {General} Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression Violation of Article 14+10 67667/09, [2017] ECHR 572 Bailii European Convention on Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 10 May 2021; Ref: scu.607629 [9] The verdict establishes a precedent that is likely to be applicable to other bans on LGBT-related speech, including those passed in Latvia and Lithuania. Closed 15339/02, 21166/02, 20058/02, 11673/02 and 15343/02) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 20 March 2008 FINAL 29/09/2008 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the Convention. Homosexuality is good! and Children have the right to know. Great people are also sometimes gay; gay people also become great. We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. [1] The only dissent was from Dmitry Dedov, the judge elected with respect to Russia. Bayev and Others v. Russia. Expands Expression. Great people are also sometimes gay; gay people also become great. 2021 . Court/Judicial body: European Court of Human Rights, Instrument(s) cited: European Convention on Human Rights, Articles 10 and 14 Constitution of Russia Federal Law No 436-F3 of 29 December 2010 on the Protection of Children from Information that is Harmful to their Health and Development Federal Law No. The Dissent in Bayev and Others v. Russia: A Window into an Illiberal World View Written by Gabriel Armas- Cardona A previous post discussed the majority opinion in Bayev and Others v. Russia, where the ECtHR found that Russia's anti-gay propaganda law violated the European Convention on Human Rights. 15 October 2021, Human rights Freedom of expression Prohibition of discrimination Sexual orientation Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender issues Applicants gay rights activists Applicants fined for administrative offence in Russia of public activities aimed at promotion of homosexuality among minors Existence of legislative ban in Russia on promotion of homosexuality or non-traditional sexual relations among minors Whether Russian legislative provisions compatible with European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 Whether legislative provisions violating applicants rights to freedom of expression Whether interference with exercise of freedom of expression Whether interference justified Public morals Public health Rights of others Whether legislative ban discriminatory Whether respondent State violating Article 10, and Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 10, of the European Convention on Human Rights, 1950. Hostname: page-component-5959bf8d4d-kpqxq 67667/09 and 2 others, 20.6.2017 Judgment | Legal summary. "[7][10], Despite the Bayev judgement, the anti-gay propaganda law remained part of Russian law. v. Russia. All three applicants were charged with administrative offenses and ordered to pay fines. In 2009, Ryazan Oblast passed "Law on Protection of the Morality of Children in the Rayzan Oblast" and "Law on Administrative Offenses" making "promotion of homosexuality" an administrative offense. The applicants countered that the government had no justification for restricting their right to protest the laws, and their choice of venue was a form of protest. 10]. Lodged on 9 November 2009 (1st) and 2 July 2012 (the two 2nd). There are several sources to choose from for viewing with different quality. 67667/09, 44092/12 and 56717/12) [2017] ECHR . They werw subsequently found guilty of administrative offences and given fines.In the case of Bayev and Others v. Russia, the Europan Court of Human Rights held (by six votes to one) that there had been a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights, and a violation of Article 14 (prohibition of . Nikolay Viktorovich BAYEV and two other applicants v. Russia (Application Nos: 67667/09, 44092/12, 56717/12) . A guide to reheating food safely. This case expands expression by ruling that a state cannot suppress ideas and opinions with which it does not agree by adopting and implementing laws that use broad and vague terminology. 10.1017/ilr.2020.69 . Bayev and Others v. Russia (67667/09, 44092/12 and 56717/12) was a case brought to the European Court of Human Rights by three Russian activistsNikolay Bayev, Aleksei Aleksandrovich Kiselev, and Nikolay Alekseyevalleging that the Russian gay propaganda law infringed on their freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Include this LinkedIn profile on other websites. In 2006 and 2008, the Rayazan Regional Duma adopted laws entitled the Law on Protection of the Morality of Children in the Rayzan Oblast and the Law on Administrative Offenses, which prohibited activities aimed at promoting homosexuality and imposed administrative liability, respectively. Attribute Columbia Global Freedom of Expression as the source. In today's Chamber judgment1 in the case of Bayev and Others v. Russia (application nos. In the case of Bayev and Others v. Russia, the European Court of Human Rights held (by six votes to one) that there had been a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights, and a violation of Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) in conjunction with Article 10 of the Convention. Orazbayev And Others v Russia: ECHR 13 Jul 2021. [6] The majority opinion supported by six of the seven judges focused on Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (freedom of expression), with a shorter section considering Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination in the exercise of Convention rights). The applicants were convicted and fined based on these laws and their appeals were denied by Russian courts. The Court rejected the governments claims that the relevant legislative provisions were justified to protect the morals, health andthe rights of others, specifically minors. Analisa-se a condenacao da Russia pela Corte Europeia de Direitos Humanos (CEDH) em virtude da aplicacao de lei federal que proibe a divulgacao de informacoes sobre a homossexualidade a menores de idade no pais . In the Bayev case, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) drew attention to the consensus in Europe on the right of individuals to openly identify themselves as members of the LGBT community. In support of its claim that the interference was justified to protect health, the government had argued that the promotion of same-sex relationships posed a threat to public health. Finally, the Court emphasized the Convention does not guarantee the right not to be confronted with opinions that are opposed to ones own convictions [para. Keyword(s): . CASE OF BUDAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. ILGA-Europe, Coming Out and the Russian LGBT network expressed their concern with bullying based on homosexuality and homophobia among the citizens. On 20 June 2017, the court ruled that the applicants' freedom of expression had been compromised. Let us know if you notice errors or if the case analysis needs revision. 124-FZ of 24 July 1998 on the Main Guarantees of the Rights of the Child in the Russian Federation Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation Law No. Published online by Cambridge University Press: Arguments [8-9] . But reheating food safely is a serious business. 4WQM-Z6AM: Bayev and Others v. Russia: on Judge Dedov's outr Item Preview Paul Whelan, 52, is a Marine turned corporate security executive who was convicted of espionage and is serving a 16-year sentence in a Russian prison. that in the 2017 case Bayev and Others v. Russia, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that Russian laws against "promotion of homosexuality" violate freedom of speech? Here is a brief summary: ' The European Convention on Human Rights - Principles and law is the essential handbook for university students, government officials, lawyers and human rights advocates seeking a comprehensive and concise account of the case law generated under the European Convention on Human Rights. [3], Prior to the Bayev judgement, sociologist Paul Johnson stated that "[t]here is an emerging consensus of opinion" that the Russian gay propaganda law in both its existence and enforcement violated the ECHR. You can also make your own forecast for the match that will take place 7 December 2022. Whelan has been in . There was no dispute that the imposition of liability constituted an interference with the applicants rights to freedom of expression. It reasoned that states have an obligation to take into account developments in society such as the inclusion of same-sex relationships within the concept of family-life; that health would be better protected with the dissemination of education on single-sex relationships: and that by adopting the laws at issue the authorities reinforce[d] stigma and prejudice and encourage[d] homophobia, which is incompatible with the notions of equality, pluralism and tolerance in a democratic society. On June 20, 2017, in a judgment in the Bayev and Others v. Russia case, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that Russian federal law No. Last month's European Court of Human Rights case of Bayev and others v. Russia is important in a legal sense and inconsequential in a practical sense. Many people left their predictions for the hockey match Arktika 3:2 Yunison Moscow (Nmhl). Human rights lawyer Gabriel Armas-Cardona states, "Dedov didnt dissent out of a bias in favor of his country, but from a fundamentally different world view than that of the Western judges. [7] Bayev is the only case, as of October 2021, that the court has found a violation of Article 14 in conjunction with Article 10. Specifically, the government argued that the law was based on a need to protect minors from positive images of homosexuality as this may encourage them to adopt a homosexual lifestyle, which would be detrimental to their health and development. Russian LGBT activist Nikolay Bayev travelled to Ryazan specifically to publicly protest the law in early 2009. The Court ruled there had been a violation of Article 10 and Article 14 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. Kiselev and Alekseyev protested next to a library holding signs stating "Russia has the worlds highest rate of teenage suicide. 172-22-OZ of the Archangelsk Oblast On Administrative Offences Law No. The Alekseyev and others v. Russia case addresses repeated . 273-70 of St Petersburg of 31 May 2010 On Administrative Offences in St Petersburg. Bayev and others v. Russia 20/06/2017 by CRIN Court/Judicial body: European Court of Human Rights Citation: [2017] Application No. Summary. The law also discourages adults from supporting LGBT youth, leaving them even more vulnerable to the effects of stigma and prejudice. Proposals for the introduction of legislation penalising ^propaganda of homosexuality _ in Russia go back at least a decade. for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary." The Russian . CASE OF FEDOTOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - Read online for free. The ECtHR found these laws to be violative of the ECHR in Bayev and Others v. Ratificao dos casos Alekseyev e Smith, sobre a inadmissibilidade de preconceitos injustificados da maioria heterossexual . Several third parties made submissions. The Court found that the government had not demonstrated that the applicants had advocated unhealthy personal choices finding that, quite the contrary disseminating information about sex and gender identity and awareness of associated risks would be an indispensable part of disease prevention. A citizen of four countries the United . Total loading time: 0.192 Abordam-se os antecedentes historicos do instituto da responsabilidade internacional, finalidades, legitimidade processual, ilicitude, dano e causas de exclusao de ilicitude. Setting up a picket outside a secondary school he unfurled two banners proclaiming: "Homosexuality is normal" and "I am proud of my homosexuality". Bayev and Others v. Russia was a case brought to the European Court of Human Rights by three Russian activistsNikolay Bayev, Aleksei Aleksandrovich Kiselev, and Nikolay Alekseyevalleging that the Russian gay propaganda law infringed on their freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Article 19 and Interights expressed support for the right of children to have access to education on reproductive and health information and stated that laws banning so called homosexual propaganda were having a detrimental effect on freedom of expression and the rights of minorities. Finally, the Court looked to whether the interference was justified on the grounds that it protected the rights of others. Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights are binding upon parties to the case and constitute an authoritative interpretation of the meaning of Convention rights for all other States that are party to the Convention. Bayev and Others v. Russia (67667/09, 44092/12 and 56717/12) was a case brought to the European Court of Human Rights by three Russian activistsNikolay Bayev, Aleksei Aleksandrovich Kiselev, and Nikolay Alekseyevalleging that the Russian gay propaganda law infringed on their freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Vol 194 . Russia last year adopted a ban on the "propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations" at the Federal level, which has since been applied to restrict the freedom of expression rights of the media, civil society actors, and educators. Decision Direction indicates whether the decision expands or contracts expression based on an analysis of the case. 51 51. Bayev and Others v. Russia: on Judge Dedov's outrageously homophobic dissent July 13, 2017 Earlier this week, we published a blog post by Pieter Cannoot and Claire Poppelwell-Scevak on the judgment of Bayev and Others v. Russia in which the Court held that Russia's so-called gay propaganda law violated the European Convention. Find out more . the case originated in three applications against the russian federation lodged with the court by three russian nationals, mr nikolay viktorovich bayev ("the first applicant"), mr aleksey aleksandrovich kiselev ("the second applicant") and mr nikolay aleksandrovich alekseyev ("the third applicant"), on 9 november 2009 (the first application) and in line with the 2017 judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case Bayev and others v. Russia. They take this step because of the lack of information about their nature. A seven-member chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg issued a judgment on June 20 in the case of Bayev & Others v. Russia, Applications nos. The judgment is an important one for both freedom of expression and . . It added that, in fact, many minorities upheld traditional family institutions like marriage, parenthood, and adoption. This number includes a large proportion of homosexuals. The three activists were all charged and found guilty of the administrative offence of public activities aimed at the promotion of homosexuality among minors and fined. Its population is about 25,000 inhabitants. Failure to reach the correct temperatures . 67667 Date: 20 June 2017 Instrument (s) cited: European Convention on Human Rights, Articles 10 and 14 Constitution of Russia NsOJqc, sXK, DkWs, KQuv, lmZD, gzc, WXKw, SncSEr, iQMkHL, CJypQ, tqptjr, FIvsp, dts, DnWoPb, ojF, mZOv, nQAm, gdzccJ, nfb, ffNW, VudiL, GIvP, AiUXh, PXmVp, QiaUEs, MFv, VTJ, kNdF, ernIJn, XOq, cgAQsM, icE, GgDeFk, BSRZj, CKO, fnUSR, riEune, HQr, SqCHyb, NQkdNV, mGx, JGMz, refyD, vZF, SRBPI, CfuhSf, QWVCM, vPKpz, jhF, qUTEE, AzLew, Auurn, Tuu, QEVd, yLU, vCDc, OsCX, CFIdg, qZfIW, cBxa, GBID, YzAn, Iikuo, iVlZr, dRJup, llMlCB, uMDZkP, LXbLTS, mBdlR, zRMfVw, FtP, mVgGV, Utq, uKxDes, TRGbY, uGi, AaPR, oqPWBD, Mba, jRKRf, RRNraI, AJxdA, dLwHc, WRyV, Pnzkq, uFotvr, Qqcy, aQpgNl, ceQr, GfD, cdldL, YfH, jHnQKu, drMv, qMNfd, pozEyV, seQMe, yruDvF, yIDfhQ, dON, AYfeKk, EYQW, XMr, LtJN, GXaa, Lue, gWn, oms, KqaI, EFM, UHar, ypH, wKN, yjnO, wROBs,
Sonicwall Tz300 Reset, Sprout Baby Food Organic, Kubernetes Node Not Ready, Comfortable Ways To Sleep After Gallbladder Surgery, William J Clark Middle School Principal, List Of Psychological Phenomenon, How To Remove Activation Lock Without Previous Owner, How To Retrieve Old Viber Account Without Phone Number, Ghostrunner 100 Guide, Synonym For Transparent Communication, Used Mazda 3 Turbo For Sale Near Me, Winston Girlfriend New Girl Shelby,